The greatest difficulty usually comes from the construction of the introductory part of the work. 2-3 introductory, introductory sentences! The composition can be compared in figuratively with the journey into the world of the work: gathering in the road and making the route – this entry, the journey itself and the acquisition of souvenirs (the facts that you really visited these places, ie, Quote) is the main part, returning home and summarizing the journey is a conclusion.
And now it is worth to get acquainted with these main parts of the composition in more detail.
There are several possible entry options. As they say, dashing trouble is the beginning. How to start an essay is always a difficult and important question. People’s wisdom will help answer it: “You have to dance from the stove.” The first step in writing a composition is to do it from the topic. First, it is necessary to specify the theme of the work, that is, to give an expanded idea of the meaning and content of the topic, in other words, dot all i.
1. The definition in the introductory part of the topic and the main thoughts of the text with the concretization and comments in subsequent parts.
Morning is the time when all life is awakened from sleep. The freshness and brightness of the morning colors, the morning coolness, the sparkling of the dew create a special mood in nature, which is transmitted to people rising with the first rays of the sun, as an invaluable gift, as the highest reward for being open to this world. About this the text of the remarkable Russian writer Vladimir Soloukhin “
Using this option to build the introductory part, one should strive for a capacious and as far as possible exhaustive definition of the basic thoughts of the text, and also remember the need for their further commentary, which can be developed as a concretization of the author’s thoughts, or as an analysis of the language and composition used by the author to express these thoughts means, or how. the expression of his position in relation to the topic disclosed by the author,
2. Definition of problems in the introductory part. The author raises or touches the text proposed for analysis.
What is real friendship? What value does friendship have in comparison with the most important, urgent work, professional duties of a person? How to...
This version of the entry is suitable for constructing reasoning on a problem text, the analysis of the content side of which requires the identification of those issues (problems) that the author was worried about. The following parts should be identified:
A) the position of the author in relation to the problems he touched;
B) the position of the graduate;
C) analysis of the language tools used by the author.
The author’s position and the position of the graduate can be presented in any sequence that does not violate the logic of the statement’s deployment, or in a relationship. 3.Expression in the introductory part of his position.
Intelligent people are now commonly referred to as those who are engaged in mental work as a result of their activities; teachers, doctors, engineers. But, in my opinion, not everyone. who deals with intellectual activity, deserves to be called an intellectual. In my understanding, an intelligent person is a person who is deeply decent, conscientious, honest in relation to people around him and to himself. Reading the text of S. Zalygin, I once again confirmed my opinion on this issue.
4. A short message about the writer. who is the author of the text: about the main problems that he touched upon
In his works, and about the connection of the problem raised in the text, with the general thrust of his work, For example:
Vladimir Soloukhin – one of those writers who can rightly be said: “This is the artist of the word.” The descriptions of nature created by him are fascinating, surprisingly accurate, emotional, expressive of his statements about a man. In his work, Soloukhin often raised the topic of the relationship between man and nature. To this topic, the writer also refers to the beautiful dewy morning.
Information about the writer-author of the text should be given in an extremely compressed volume (no more than three sentences or a fifth of the text),
Often as a material for analysis, the text of an unknown writer or publicist is proposed. “In this case, one should not rush to make broad generalizations only on the basis of the text that is read, and the described type of entry should be abandoned,