Structure of a work of art
Even at first glance, it is clear that the artwork consists of certain aspects, elements, aspects, etc. In other words, it has a complex internal composition. At the same time, individual parts of the work are connected and united with each other so closely that it gives a reason to assimilate the work metaphorically to a living organism. The composition of a work is thus characterized not only by complexity, but also by order. Artwork is a complex whole; from the realization of this obvious fact, it is necessary to know the internal structure of the work, that is, to isolate its individual components and to realize the connections between them. The rejection of such an attitude inevitably leads to empiricism and the lack of evidence of judgments about the work,
In modern literary criticism, there are two main trends in establishing the structure of a work. The first is based on the selection in the product of a number of layers, or levels, just as in linguistics in a separate
The general drawback of these concepts can obviously be considered subjectivity and arbitrariness of the leveling. In addition, no one has yet attempted to justify the division into levels by some general considerations and principles. The second weakness follows from the first and consists in the
The second approach to the structure of a work of art as a primary division takes such general categories as content and form. In the most complete and reasoned form this approach is presented in the works of GN Pospelov. This methodological trend has much fewer minuses than the one discussed above, it is much more in line with the real structure of the work and is much more substantiated in terms of philosophy and methodology.