“Russian Forest” Leonov’s work
Dramatically sharp in the writings of modern writers questions of the relationship between man and nature. The pathos of conquest was replaced by the idea of the organic unity of man and nature, the need to protect the surrounding world not simply as an “environment” but as a basis for human existence, gained by all our hard experience. It is no accident that so much attention is paid to the nature of V. Belov in the book of essays on folk aesthetics, called “Lad”. The writer shows that the cyclical nature of the seasons has always determined the rhythm of the working life of the villager, and the peculiarities of his life, behavior, traditions, rites. “Man always felt his oneness with nature,” concludes V. Belov In alliance with her, he created himself and the high beauty of his soul, reflected in the culture of work, “in art, in relation to the world and man.
Modern “ecological prose” develops in the traditions of the
Starting from the idea that “to our people to live forever in this sacred land,” Vikhrov comes to the conclusion about the need for “genuine relay”, a masterly, rational attitude to nature. “There is no such point in a single body of nature, a long-term impact on which would not affect the most remote areas.” Nature seems to entrust its treasures with the prudence of man, and its task is not to damage its delicate mechanism.
The novel sounds actual for modern literature about the careful attitude to all life on Earth: from a weak and defenseless cell to a higher intelligent being – a person.
The forest is not just wood, it’s not only green spruce and birch, “the forest is part of the Fatherland concept.” The image of the forest becomes a semantic center in the work, all the plot lines of the novel, its most important ideas, converge to it. Nature, the forest for L. Leonov is a powerful source of spiritual power, it is the personification of the whole of the Russian land, the values that the people have accumulated for its millennial history. Revealing the philosophical meaning of the work helps the key scenes of the novel, in particular, three meetings at the fontanel. In the cherished corner of the forest, the mystery of the birth of the great Russian river, personifying the people’s soul, is taking place. “The guardian of the shrine” is the author called Vikhrova. Attitude to the fontanel shows the purity of Vikhrov’s soul and the meanness of Gratsiansky, who does not need to stick a stick into the fontanel, like a trembling beating, defenseless human heart. In a small episode reveals the deep essence of the conflict between the heroes of the novel: Vikhrov defends not just the source of the river and the Russian forest, he asserts his ideas and deeds of life, beauty, humanity. Continuity of generations is embodied in the image of the boy Kalinka, who continues to guard the fontanel. V. Soloukhin drew attention to consonance, the closeness of concepts: spring, nature, to be born (ie, to live), relatives, people, Motherland. In this context, the deep meaning of the work will become clear, in which L. Leonov showed the interrelationship of environmental issues with the problems of the spiritual life of the people, history, philosophy, ethics, aesthetics. humanity. Continuity of generations is embodied in the image of the boy Kalinka, who continues to guard the fontanel. V. Soloukhin drew attention to consonance, the closeness of concepts: spring, nature, to be born (ie, to live), relatives, people, Motherland. In this context, the deep meaning of the work will become clear, in which L. Leonov showed the interrelationship of environmental issues with the problems of the spiritual life of the people, history, philosophy, ethics, aesthetics. humanity. Continuity of generations is embodied in the image of the boy Kalinka, who continues to guard the fontanel. V. Soloukhin drew attention to consonance, the closeness of concepts: spring, nature, to be born (ie, to live), relatives, people, Motherland. In this context, the deep meaning of the work will become clear, in which L. Leonov showed the interrelationship of environmental issues with the problems of the spiritual life of the people, history, philosophy, ethics, aesthetics.
(1 votes, average: 5.00 out of 5)